That said, they did gloss over the morality of it a bit. I think that the fact that it's probably not permanent lessens the moral quandary at some level it's not like the protagonist had a lot of options here. Kathleen: I agree with Doug that there's a practical problem with the hormone therapy in the long run. Unless it just suppressed her down deep enough to where Linus couldn't find her, but I'm more inclined to believe that Stacy will never be found again. I am not familiar enough with hormone treatments to be able to guess at how long it would last, but from how Linus talked about it, it seemed like the treatment essentially killed Stacy. Linus talking about how he couldn't find Stacy broke my heart. It seemed callous.Īllison: I understand why they did it, and it is more preferable than killing them both, but it was cruel. That said, what bothered me most about it wasn't just the ethics, but how flippant and dismissive Hank and Nick were when Linus was distressed about losing Stacy after what they did. Robin: I'm with Monroe on this I understood the need, but trapping someone in one of their personalities without their consent or understanding was unethical. It would have been better for Nick to have lopped his head off – the guy/girl is dangerous. Doug: The only thing I could think of was: how long does is that hormone therapy supposed to last? And how do Nick and company inform the prison that he needs to be kept on it, with regular doses? It seemed like a huge plot hole to me.
0 kommentar(er)
